The great liberal denial: Ft Hood not a terror attack.

[Grayling]

They'll deny calling it terrorism to the end....even when the wonderful religion of peace has a sword to their throat.

[Lookin'up]

Just ask those who survived if there was any terror?

[watchman]

Daniel 8;25 "..and through his cunning, he shall cause deceit to prosper under his rule."

[Little Bug]

Originally Posted by WaitingPatiently

Not deluded at all....diabolical! These people don't want the American Public to see that their engagement and making nice with the radicals isn't working....they don't want people to understand THEY ARE FAILING! They came into power screaming how they are better for us and how they are going to change us for the good........the good.........thats DOUBLE DIGIT UNEMPOLYMENT (anyone remember Obama's pledge that it wouldn't get above 8% if we hurried and passed the stimulas bill?)...the fall of the U.S Dollar (as they print more and more worthless pieces of paper to cover their greed and corruption...the transparent Government we were supposed to have.......the lack of influence peddlers there was supposed to be.....the lack of an Iranian bomb they were going to assure....and the promise to keep America safe from terror plots in the US...THEY FAILED and continue to FAIL........

Remember this in 2010 and 2012....and don't let them cloud this issues...the TRUE issues.....THEY FAILED and....THEY LIED! PERIOD!

God Bless and Protect You All

AMEN!!

[turtle]

I think these words used by the left and the president are engineered to keep the American public subdued.
The Globalist know that an uprising of the American public could and would seriously jeopardize their plans for a U.S. and global takeover .
So even if Islamist's detonated a WMD on American soil killing 100,000 people, the Liberal left and B.Hussein Obama would be saying the same things(lets not jump to conclusions, and of coarse this doesn't represent all the peace loving Muslims in our nation...)

Im telling you its the same line we get after every big attack including 9/11.
and its done to make sure that Americans are subdued.
Because Americans (REAL AMERICANS THAT IS) must not be allowed to rise up and take their nation back from Islamics and illegal Mexicans and some other groups that are home grown America haters.

Keep the American population in a state of Fear and consumption.

[Teotwawki]

The real reason? They want to misplace blame. They want to blame the problem on guns, so they can take away our guns. Calling it a "shooting" accomplishes that, calling it a "terrorist attack" doesn't.

[Jaybird74]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...errorists.html

How sad . . . it takes a BRITISH newspaper to even come close to approaching the truth. Journalism in the U.S. is done for.

[TimothyK]

Nothing less then a terrorist attack by Radical Islam. If Islam has declared Jihad (holy war) on the west (AKA USA), and they're obviously serious what with 9/11 and all... we probably shouldn't be allowing practicing Muslims into positions of authority and power. That's not the most politically correct thing to say, it's incredibly prudent, and incredibly wise if you understand the nature of the Islamic religion. Destroy your enemy by any means, pretend to be their friend if necessary and then stab them in the back for great glory, honor, and a place in islam-heaven for 70-something female virgins (sorry ladies, if you read the Koran literally, that goes for you too) for a big celestial orgy. They're dead serious. They will die happily for it.

We need to take off the kid gloves when dealing with Islam, before we get our hands chopped off. We need a pig on every airplane, military base, installation, white house, NASA, and any other place of importance. The islamic terrorists we capture alive should be forced to share a jail cell with a pig, and if not sentenced to death by bullets laced in pigs blood, be forced to clean up after pigs. I don't know why we can't entertain the idea. I think Israel once thought about something like this if I'm remembering right, to combat terrorism. They should have given it a trial run.

Islamic terrorist attacks would be reduced dramatically overnight. It sounds funny, it is funny, and I'm dead serious. It's cheaper then all this other expensive nothing we're doing too. And fun. Who doesn't like a cute little pet oinker for anti-terrorist purposes?

[MrMannn]

I posted this as a test on several liberal boards, including our shadow board.
in every case I was called a racist for calling this a terrorist act just because Hasan was a brown muslim. Every time.

And then every bord did the same thing. they went to accuse Christians of all sorts of terrorist acts, and called our wars against the brown muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan as wars of terror (but some disagreed and stuck with the war for oil talking point).

with accusations of racist flying at the merest hint of disagreement, the word will soon mean nothing.

[Daniel1210]

What's really sad is that these liberals are blind to the fact that the muslims want them just as dead as the rest of us.

[peaceseeker]

FT. HOOD ATTACK WAS TERRORISM

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on DickMorris.com on November 8, 2009


In his nationally televised remarks following the horrendous killings at Ft. Hood, President Obama never mentioned the T word. The attack was an act "of violence." No mention of terrorism.

In fact, the Ft. Hood shooting is the first terror attack on American soil since 9-11. But Obama, reluctant to take the rap for inadequate protections against such attacks, is doing everything he can to make it look like an adult version of the Columbine school shootings. We are treated to stories about the killer's dread of being sent back to Afghanistan and his deformed personality.

But, the fact is that Major Nidal Malik Hasan jumped on a table, yelled "Alah Hu Akhbar" and began the shooting rampage that killed 13 people and wounded 30 more.

Ilana Freedman, CEO and Senior Analyst for the Gerard Group International, which provides intelligence analysis for business and homeland security, describes Hasan as a "lone wolf terrorist" who acts without apparent coordination with any other person or organization. But that does not make him any less of a terrorist.

The dividing line, of course, between a terrorist and a psychopathic killer is political motivation. His statements right before opening fire would indicate that Hasan was motivated by fanaticism and a commitment to Islamic fascism, even though President Obama bends over backwards to avoid saying so.

Obama's refusal to call the attack terrorism, and to heed the warning signs about the porous nature of our security system that allowed it to happen on a military base, recalls President Clinton's deliberate decision to downplay the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. He did not visit the site of the attack and treated it as a crime, promising to find those guilty and punish them, rather than to attack the international groups that funded and enabled them.

There may be no groups behind Major Hasan's attack, but the fact that he was an officer in the Army, with full access to a military base and its arsenal of weapons, while holding the views he did, is the first indication of a laxity in security under President Obama. This attack did not take place in a shopping mall or a school, where security procedures are, understandably, relaxed. It happened on the highest security place of all - a military base! That the military failed to spot the possibility of an attack and had no measures in place to prevent it must be laid at the feet of the commander-in-chief of that military: President Barack Obama.

Many commentators have warned that the diminution of security and the weakening of our anti-terrorist protections would leave us vulnerable to be hit again. Now it has happened. And the president is doing everything he can to blur the distinction between murder and terrorism.

It was his failure to understand the difference between an act of war and a crime that undermined President Clinton's administration's anti-terror efforts and led directly to 9-11. It would appear that President Obama is going down the same road of denial and minimization of political harm. There may be casualties at Ft. Hood, but Obama is determined that his popularity will not be among them.