Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Administration Warns of 'Command-and-Control' Regulation Over Emissions

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Administration Warns of 'Command-and-Control' Regulation Over Emissions

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...ion-emissions/

    - FOXNews.com
    - December 09, 2009

    Administration Warns of 'Command-and-Control' Regulation Over Emissions

    The Obama administration is warning Congress that if it doesn't move to regulate greenhouse gases, the Environmental Protection Agency will take a "command-and-control" role over the process in way that could hurt business.


    The Obama administration is warning Congress that if it doesn't move to regulate greenhouse gases, the Environmental Protection Agency will take a "command-and-control" role over the process in a way that could hurt business.

    The warning, from a top White House economic official who spoke Tuesday on condition of anonymity, came on the eve of EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson's address to the international conference on climate change in Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Jackson, however, tried to strike a tone of cooperation in her address Wednesday, explaining that the EPA's new powers to regulate greenhouse gases will be used to complement legislation pending in Congress, not replace it.

    "This is not an 'either-or' moment. It's a 'both-and' moment," she said.

    But while administration officials have long said they prefer Congress take action on climate change, the economic official who spoke with reporters Tuesday night made clear that the EPA will not wait and is prepared to act on its own.

    And it won't be pretty.

    "If you don't pass this legislation, then ... the EPA is going to have to regulate in this area," the official said. "And it is not going to be able to regulate on a market-based way, so it's going to have to regulate in a command-and-control way, which will probably generate even more uncertainty."

    Climate change legislation that passed the House is stuck in the Senate, but the EPA finding Monday was seen as a boost to the U.S. delegation in Denmark trying to convince other countries that Washington is capable of taking action to follow through with any global commitments.

    The economic official explained that congressional action could be better for the economy, since it would provide "compensation" for higher energy prices, especially for small businesses dealing with those higher energy costs. Otherwise, the official warned that the kind of "uncertainty" generated by unilateral EPA action would be a huge "deterrent to investment," in an economy already desperate for jobs.

    "So, passing the right kind of legislation with the right kind of compensations seems to us to be the best way to reduce uncertainty and actually to encourage investment," the official said.

    Republicans fear that the EPA will ultimately end up stepping in to regulate emissions -- though many oppose the congressional legislation as well. They had urged Jackson to withdraw the finding in light of leaked e-mails from a British research center that appeared to show scientists discussing the manipulation of climate data.

    Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., ranking Republican on the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming, said Tuesday he is going to attend the Copenhagen conference to inform world leaders that despite any promises made by President Obama, no new laws will be passed in the United States until the "scientific fascism" ends.

    "I call it 'scientific fascism,'" Sensenbrenner said during a press conference with fellow climate change skeptics. Sensenbrenner said, "The U.N. should throw a red flag" on scientists who support global warming to the exclusion of dissent.

    Administration officials, though, said the e-mails do not change the debate.

    Former Vice President Al Gore, a leader in the movement on man-caused climate change, told CNN on Wednesday that the e-mails in questions were 10 years old and taken "out of context."

    Fox News' Major Garrett and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

  • #2
    Oh, and since CO2 is now considered a polutant, we should force all the politicians to shut up because of all the hot air they spew from their mouths on a daily basis... The world would be a much nicer place.
    "Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies, The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
    C.S. Lewis

    Comment


    • #3
      What needs to happen now is to let the Administration do exactly what they are warning against (after all, since when does an Executive Agency do ANYTHING in the matter of Policy not approved by the President...who are you kidding Obama!) Let them do it.....The in 2010 we elect a new Congress...throw Nancy and Harry out on their not so celebrated bumbums and then.....vote to cut off all funds to the EPA so they can never be used as a stick to beat the American taxpayers over the head again....THEN...point a finger at the Mighty O and say..."you're next dude...2012!"

      God Bless and Protect You All

      Comment


      • #4
        Well it just sounds like the EPA w/Obama's blessing is threatening Congress.
        Ph 3:15 (paraphrased):...And if on some point you and I think differently, that too God will make clear to us. Only let us live up to what we have already attained.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by carol1948 View Post
          Well it just sounds like the EPA w/Obama's blessing is threatening Congress.
          They are.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by carol1948 View Post
            Well it just sounds like the EPA w/Obama's blessing is threatening Congress.
            How is this legal?

            Well, I wonder how the business sector is going to like this. Can't say I'm hearing anything from any of the labor unions. SEIU - where are you? UAW - anything from y'all? How will the prompter-reader in chief handle this one and pass this on to his adoring fans?
            Romans 8:31 "31What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us? "

            Romans 8:38-39 "For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."

            Comment


            • #7
              I'll bet you guys didn't know that the EPA actually has it's own heavily armed SWAT-style enforcers. They use them when they raid environmental "offenders", usually office buildings.

              I know of some other stories. This one is from last summer.

              1st Polluter shot by EPA officers in organization's history
              http://keysnews.com/node/15028

              Comment


              • #8
                This man is just pure unadulterated evil!

                Comment


                • #9

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You better stop breathing.. Get ready for the Breathing tax... to pay for all that evil CO2 you exhale.. Then animal farmers will have to pay a CO2 tax, because all those animals exhale CO2..

                    Then IF CO2 levels fall, we will need some sort of tax so we can help create new plants that don't need CO2 to survive..

                    this is all a bunch of bunk... the EPA is now going to far... but CONGRESS will do nothing...

                    I'm ready to go home...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MoreThanReady View Post
                      You better stop breathing.. Get ready for the Breathing tax... to pay for all that evil CO2 you exhale.. Then animal farmers will have to pay a CO2 tax, because all those animals exhale CO2..

                      Then IF CO2 levels fall, we will need some sort of tax so we can help create new plants that don't need CO2 to survive..

                      this is all a bunch of bunk... the EPA is now going to far... but CONGRESS will do nothing...

                      I'm ready to go home...
                      If it comes to a breathing tax, take me HOME!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X