Time to Move to Rapture Forums

Brothers and Sisters,

Rapture Ready's Bulletin Board is no longer maintained. Members have been moving to Rapture Forum's Bulletin Board Apparently unrepairable bugs in our software after a needed upgrade led to the decision to close Rapture Ready and to encourage members to continue fellowship at Rapture Forums. You'll find an active and vibrant Bulletin Board at Rapture Forums. See you there!
See more
See less

Text Messages & FISA Fiasco

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Text Messages & FISA Fiasco

    Well, this shouldn't be surprising.. I'm just wondering where this all will really go given the sorry state of lame stream...

  • #2
    Saw this on Fox yesterday, not sure if the driveby's reported on it, will be interesting to see where this Mueller investigation goes and for how much longer, with any amount of light coming into this picture the bugs should be running for cover.
    John 10:27-30 My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.


    • #3
      I’ve been following this for months. The Conservative Treehouse website lays out everything beautifully. Highly recommend reading the posts there!


      • #4
        GOP Rep: There Are Texts That Seem To Suggest Election Meddling At The FBI

        In December, The Wall Street Journal editorial board alleged that there might be election meddling occurring at the FBI. Text messages between former counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, a bureau lawyer, referenced an “insurance policy” with regards to Trump. What does that mean? The text was sent in August of 2016, a month after the FBI has started a counterintelligence investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. Some say that the “insurance” is a reference to the Trump dossier. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), chair of the House Freedom Caucus, took to Twitter to comment on the Strzok-Page texts, which he says supports the allegation that there might have been election meddling at the FBI.

        For starters, both Page and Strzok discussed pressure to finish the Hillary email probe once it became clear Donald Trump was going to be the GOP nominee. That text was sent on May 4, 2016—the day Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) dropped out of the race. Also, Strzok was the one who changed then-FBI’s James Comey’s remarks to say Hillary Clinton was extremely careless with her email server instead of grossly negligent, the latter being a crime, which Meadows cited under the “reasonable person standard.” That had to be changed.

        “Think about how important that is,” wrote Meadows. “We have a text from Peter Strzok talking about the pressure to end the Clinton investigation, and then--within 48 hours--documents suggesting Peter Strzok changed Dir. Comey's letter from criminal charges to just ‘carelessness.’ That's major.”

        Hmmm... as the Lord continues to work through President Trump, it appears more and more possible that a great many; including Mueller, many Democratic politicians, individual members of the FBI and other Federal agencies, etc. might just find themselves facing criminal convictions with serious, perhaps lifetime consequences.
        Tall Timbers, Imperfect but forgiven

        3 trees


        • #5
          'bout time!


          • #6
            I would love to see all the scumbags be thrown in Gitmo, but in reality, WHO is going to do that? Unless there is a massive amt. of counter-investigation/unmasking going on that is covert, it appears our current DOJ isn't interested. Only a few senators and reps. are pursuing the truth, and they get obstructed at every turn when trying to get documents. I follow Judicial Watch, and the deep state, including current DOJ, constantly refuses to release documents under the Freedom of Informaiton Act, and they aren't asking for classified documents.
            Now we have Kerry going to play footsies this week with the enemy, and telling them "don't worry, Trump won't be in power much longer?? Looks like the FBI informant to the few congressmen is revealing that the missing documents include what appears to be a plot to take Trump out?
            I know God put Trump in to fulfill His purposes, and he will stay there until that is accomplished, but I keep sensing that it's to bring us rapidly to the rapture. Fine with me-----


            • #7
              I'll believe that something is going to be done about it when I see it.
              Last edited by Shonsu; January 25th, 2018, 11:13 PM.


              • #8
                Originally posted by Shonsu View Post
                I'll believe that something it going to be done about it when I see it.
                Agreed.... Was listening to someone who pointed out that during the Watergate era the entire nation
                and all of the political interests were glued to and outraged over what was happening. I well remember it myself.

                Entirely different world now......Yeah, it's understandable we're all getting glazed over with this never ending
                wrangling and incessant attacks on President Trump..but now with mid term primary and general less than
                a few to 10 months's going to be sketchy for candidates and not the time fo take the eye off the ball
                for the voters. Most of these characters are not elected to anything! We need to hear..."You're Fired", maybe
                the sleepwalkers will remember that


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MilkyWay View Post
                  I’ve been following this for months. The Conservative Treehouse website lays out everything beautifully. Highly recommend reading the posts there!
                  I follow Conservative Treehouse too! A lot of it is SO much information that it's sometimes hard for me to follow, but I know the basics. It's the kind of thing that almost seems like an espionage novel or movie. To think it might actually be real-life is bizarre.
                  "Oir is leatsa an rioghachd, agus an cumhachd, agus a gloir, gu siorraidh, Amen." ("For Thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever, Amen" -- Scots Gaelic)


                  • #10
                    Anything electronic is retrievable and anything electronic is being retrieved by our government and possible many others. Texts, emails, and all other information is being collected and likely used to blackmail our leaders. But there are major dem/liberal/progressive/socialist power players able to stifle and bury the information with the kind of bullying and intimidation that can be deadly.


                    • #11
                      WSJ Columnist: Why is the Media Ignoring the Real Bombshell FISA Memo?

                      We'll bring you Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberly Strassel's tweetstorm in a moment, but I'll take a stab at answering her question about the media right out of the gate. Three possibilities: (1) The GOP hyped the Nunes memo, which quickly became the center of this whole firestorm -- replete with counter-memos, FBI objections, etc. The press followed the spotlight. (2) As we've been saying, there are so many complex pieces of this larger puzzle, following the plot is difficult. It's not just news consumers wondering, "which memo is this now?" -- it's many of the people trying to cover this drama, too. The document in question here is a second, less redacted, version of a Senate memo that few people have even heard of. (3) The Senate memo, produced by non-bomb-throwers Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham, is substantially more disruptive to the Democrats' narrative than the Nunes document. And the press generally prefers Democratic narratives to Republican ones because most journalists are liberals.

                      My guess is that some blend of all three factors helps explain why the Grassley/Graham memo has barely registered on the national radar, even after we've endured multiple high-octane news cycles starring Nunes and Schiff. But on the substance, does Strassel have a point, or is this just the latest shiny object the right-wing is waving around to distract from "the real story," now that the Nunes memo was arguably a bit of a dud? Here's her case:


                      Seems like there is enough evidence available not even counting stuff that is still classified or that hasn't been released to the public to bring a boatload of felony indictments. A President is immune from prosecution while in office but can be impeached. Once out of office it is my understanding that a past president can be prosecuted for crimes committed while holding office (I'm thinking of obama here...)

                      Tall Timbers, Imperfect but forgiven

                      3 trees